Official publication of Rawalpindi Medical University
Comparative Study of the Perioperative Care of Head and Neck Surgical Patients with and without Central Venous Pressure Line

Supplementary Files

PDF

How to Cite

1.
Ali A, Khurram M, Khan FA, Shah SMK. Comparative Study of the Perioperative Care of Head and Neck Surgical Patients with and without Central Venous Pressure Line. JRMC [Internet]. 2026 May 5 [cited 2026 May 5];16(2). Available from: https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/3262

Abstract

Background: To study the practice of central venous pressure (CVP) line insertion in perioperative head and neck surgical patients.
Methods: In this comparative study, patients undergoing elective major head and neck surgery were divided into two groups. Group I (n=22) included those with CVP line insertion and Group II (n=38) without CVP line insertion.Perioperative patient care was assessed in terms of clinical (perioperative hypotension, oliguria, and transfusion requirement) and laboratory parameters (pre and post operative hemoglobin, and estimated blood
loss).
Results: No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of age, gender, weight, and pre-operative hemoglobin levels. Both groups differed significantly in terms of co morbidities (68%:36%, p<0.05), hypotension (50%:15%, p<0.05), oliguria (31.8%:7.8%, p<0.05), post operative haemoglobin (9.75±1.10:10.52±1.11g, p<0.05), and estimated blood loss (846 ±420:588±290 ml, p<0.05).
Conclusion: CVP line insertion in major head and neck surgery patients is influenced by presence of co-morbidities. Perioperative patient care does not improve with CVP line insertion.
Key Words: Central Venous Pressure, Head and Neck, Surgery, Co-morbidity

https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v16i2.3262

References

Hughes, RE, Magovern, GJ The relationship between right atrial pressure and blood volume. Arch Surg 1959; 79: 23841

Jensen NF, Todd MM, Block RI, Hegtvedt RL, McCulloch TM. The efficacy of routine central venous monitoring in major head and neck surgery. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 119-25.

Wijayasiri L, Garewal D, Khpal M, Rhodes A, Dewhurst A. Does stroke volume increase after a fluid challenge? A study on the management of patients undergoing major head and neck free flap surgery: preliminary data. Critical Care 2010; 14( 1): 119-24

Eipe N, Ponniah M. Perioperative blood loss assessment: how accurate? Indian J Anaesth 2006; 50:35-38.

Grocott MP, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 2005; 100(4):1093-106.

Boldt J, Lenz, M, Kumle B Volume replacement strategies on

intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive

Care Med 1998; 24:147-51.

Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. Crit 92. Care Med 999; 27: 887-

Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 286: 700-07.

Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central vein catheterization: failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern 1986; 146: 259-61. Med

Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1994; 271: 1598-1601.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2012 Amjad Ali, Muhammad Khurram, Fozia Anis Khan, Syed Muhammad Khalid Shah