Microdebrider-Assisted Turbinoplasty and Submucosal Diathermy for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Muhammad Arshad Rawalpindi medical university
  • Ahmed Hasan Ashfaq Associate Professor ENT Rawalpindi Medical University
  • Muhammad Tayyab Rasheed Assistant professor ENT Nawaz Sharif Medical College UOG
  • Mahwash Khawaja Senior Registrar ENT BBH RWP
  • Muhammad Nadeem Langove House Officer Rawalpindi Medical University
  • Muhammad Sheharyar Khan
Keywords: Turbinate, Microdebrider, Diathermy, Nasal Obstruction

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background: Nasal obstruction is a common presenting problem which can lead to symptoms like sleep disturbances, mouth breathing, oral cavity dryness. Hypertrophied inferior turbinate is a common cause of nasal obstruction. Microdebrider assisted turbinoplasty and submucosal diathermy are widely used methods for patients who fail to respond to medical therapy to relieve obstruction. The aim of the study was to compare two methods in terms of relief of nasal obstruction, reduction in sneezing and post-operative complications.

Material & Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at ENT Department, Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan for one year from 01-03-2018 to 28-02-2019. One hundred and twenty patients were randomized to into either MAT and SMD groups each with 60 patients. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation score system (NOSE) was used to access relieve from obstruction and sneezing. SPSS 22, online chai square and fisher exact test calculators were used to analyze the data.

Results:

Two groups were comparable for age and gender. After 3 months of treatment, all patients in MAT group and 51 patients in SMD group were completely relieved from obstruction. At two weeks follow up 37(61.57%) patients in MAT group had grade 0 obstruction compared with 14 (23.33%) in SMD group and this difference was significant (p value .000). at one month follow up 55 (91.67%) patients in MAT while 46 (76.67%) had completely relieved obstruction and this difference was significant ( p value .024). Not all patients showed reduction in sneezing in both groups. 37 patients in MAT and 25 patients in SMD group had completely relieved from sneezing at third month follow up with MAT group showing significantly more patients with sneezing reduced at one month follow up. Crust formation was most seen complication in both groups, more with SMD group at two weeks follow up which responded to treatment alkaline nasal douches and crust removal.

 

Conclusion:

MAT gives better in terms of nasal obstruction relieved, reduction in sneezing and less complications than SMD  procedure.

KEYWORDS: Microdebrider; Diathermy; Turbinates; Nasal obstruction

 

References

REFRENCES

1-Kotrannavar VK, Angadi SS. Kshara application for turbinate hypertrophy. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2013; 4(4):241–244. doi: 10.4103/0975-9476.123722
2-Varshney J, Varshney H. Allergic Rhinitis: an Overview. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 67(2):143–149. doi: 10.1007/s12070-015-0828-5
3- Balbach L, Trinkel V, Guldner C, Bien S, Teymoortash A, Werner JA, Bremke M.Radiological examinations of the anatomy of the inferior turbinate using digital volume tomography (DVT). Rhinology. 2011; 49(2):248-52. doi: 10.4193/Rhino09.204
4-Sharma S. Importance of Treating Compensatory Hypertrophy of Inferior Turbinate in Cases of Septal Deviation Causing Nasal Obstruction. J Otolaryngol ENT Res. 2016;4(3): 00097. doi: 10.15406/joentr.2016.04.00097
5-El-Anwar MW, Hamed AA, Abdulmonaem G, Elnashar I, Elfiki IM. Computed Tomography Measurement of Inferior Turbinate in Asymptomatic Adult. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 21(4):366–370. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598649
6- Scheithauer MO. Surgery of the turbinates and "empty nose" syndrome. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 9:Doc03. Doi: 10.3205/cto000067. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
7- Kuduban O, Bingol F, Budak A, Kucur C. The Reason for Dissatisfaction of Patient after Septoplasty. Eurasian J Med. 2015; 47(3):190–193. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2015.18
8- Parida PK, Surianarayanan G, Alexander A, Saxena SK, Santhosh K. Diode laser turbinate reduction in the treatment of symptomatic inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65(2):350–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0515-8
9- Kanaya T, Kohno N. Submucosal Inferior Turbinoplasty Using a New Continuous Suction Irrigation Method. Front Surg. 2017; 4:24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00024
10- Şapçı T, Güvenç MG, Evcimik MF. Radiofrequency treatment for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2011;21(1):56-60.
11- Okhuakhu AL, Ogisi FO. Submocal diathermy in inferior turbinate hypertrophy: Review of 12 cases in Benin City. SMJ. 2015; 18(2):71-73.
12-Van delden MR, Cook PR, Davis WE.Endoscopic partial inferior turbinoplasty.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 121(4):406-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70229-9
13-Gupta A, Mercurio E, Bielamowicz S. Endoscopic inferior turbinate reduction: an outcomes analysis. -Laryngoscope. 2001; 111(11):1957-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200111000-00016
14- Ercan C, Imre A, Pinar E, Erdogan N, Sakarya EU, Oncel S. Comparison of Submucosal Resection and Radiofrequency Turbinate Volume Reduction for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 66(3):281–286. doi: 10.1007/s12070-013-0696-9
15- Dhulipalla S. Comparative Study of Response through Reduction in the Size of Hypertrophied Inferior Turbinate Causing Nasal Obstruction by Different Surgical Modalities: A Prospective Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 67(1):56–59. doi: 10.1007/s12070-014-0772-9
16- Uluyol S, Karakaya NE, Gur MH et al. Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation versus Bipolar Electrocautery for the Treatment of Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: Comparison of Efficacy and Postoperative Morbidity. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 20:2–5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1551553
17-Cingi C, Ure B, Cakli H, Ozudogru E. Microdebrider-assisted versus Radiofrequency Assisted Inferior Turbinoplasty: A Prospective study with bjective and subjective outcome measures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010; 30:138-143.
18- Kumar K, Kumar S, Garg S. A comparative study of radiofrequency assisted versus microdebrider assisted turbinoplasty in cases of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 66(1):35–39. doi: 10.1007/s12070-013-0657-3
Published
2020-12-30
How to Cite
1.
Arshad M, Ashfaq A, Rasheed M, Khawaja M, Langove M, Khan M. Microdebrider-Assisted Turbinoplasty and Submucosal Diathermy for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JRMC [Internet]. 30Dec.2020 [cited 27Nov.2021];24(4):390-4. Available from: https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1470

Most read articles by the same author(s)