Comparison of Tzanakis and Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, with Histopathology as gold standard

  • Muhammad Zafar Iqbal Rawalpindi Medical University
  • Malik Irfan Ahmed RAWALPINDI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
  • Naveed Akhtar Malik Rawalpindi Medical University
  • Ali Kamran Rawalpindi Medical University
  • Muhammad Umar Qaiser Rawalpindi Medical University
  • Samra Riaz Rawalpindi Medical University
Keywords: , Tzanakis, Appendectomy, predictive scores, Alvarado, Histopathology, Histopathology, Alvarado, predictive scores, Tzanakis

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Tzanakis and Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis taking histopathology as the gold standard.

Materials and Methods: It was a Cross-sectional validation study The study was carried out at the emergency department of RMC allied hospital Rawalpindi. The study was completed in eighteen months from 1st May 2016 till 30th Nov 2017. After approval from the ethical committee total of 420 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria from the emergency department of District head Quarter hospital, Rawalpindi was taken. Informed consent was taken from patients or their attendants, and their demographic information like name, age, sex, and address was obtained. Alvarado score and Tzanakis score were calculated (as per operational definition) at the time of admission of the patients. After surgery, the specimen appendix was sent for histopathology in the hospital lab.  The diagnosis of the acute appendix was based on a positive histological report which was verified by a pathologist. All the data was entered by a researcher who will collect the data by himself.

Results: The mean age of patients in this study was 20.15±7.13 years with 218 (51.9%) males and 202 (48.1%) females. The mean Alvardo score was recorded as 7.22±1.58 with the mean Tzanakis score being 9.64±3.13. The histopathology for diagnosing appendicitis showed positive for 367 (87.4%) patients and negative for 53 (12.6%) patients. The sensitivity of Alvarado score for diagnosing appendicitis, keeping histopathology as the gold standard was 86.92%, specificity was 92.45%, Positive Predictive Value was 98.76%, and Negative Predictive Value was 50.52% and overall diagnostic accuracy was 87.62%. The sensitivity of the Tzanakis score for diagnosing appendicitis, keeping histopathology as the gold standard was 88.83%, specificity was 88.6%, Positive Predictive Value was 98.19%, Negative Predictive Value was 53.41% and overall diagnostic accuracy was 88.81%.

Conclusion: The sensitivity of the Tzanakis score was high when compared to the Alvarado score. And specificity was high in the Alvarado score when compared to the Tzanakis score. Moreover, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the Tzanakis score was high when compared to the Alvarado score. SoTzanakis score can be utilized to predict appendix and in the future, we can avoid negative appendectomies.

References

Reference :
1- Omari AH, Khammash MR, Qasaimeh GR, Shammari AK, Yaseen MKB, Hammori SK. Acute appendicitis in the elderly: risk factors for perforation. World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2014;9(1):1.
2- Olakolu S, Lloyd C, Day G, Wellington P. Diagnosis Of Acute Appendicitis At Mandeville Regional Hospital (MRH): Clinical Judgment Versus Alvarado Score. The Internet Journal of Surgery 2010;27(1).
3- Alnjadat I, Abdallah B. Alvarado versus RIPASA score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Rawal Medical Journal 2013;38(2):147-51.
4- Arbab R, Khan MI, Mehmood M, Marri MM, Khan JA. Diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score in the prediction of acute appendicitis. Pak J Surg 2013;29(4):272-7.
5- Nanjundaiah N, Mohammed A, Shanbhag V, Ashfaque K, Priya S. A comparative study of RIPASA score and ALVARADO score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2014;8(11):NC03.
6- Chong C, Thien A, Mackie A, Tin A, Tripathi S, Ahmad M, et al. Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore medical journal 2011;52(5):340-5.
7- Malla B, Batajoo H. Comparison of Tzanakis Score vs Alvarado Score in the Effective diagnosis of acute Appendicitis. Kathmandu University Medical Journal 2015;12(1):48-50.
8- Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC medicine 2011;9(1):1.
9- Seal A. Appendicitis: a historical review. Canadian journal of surgery Journal canadien de chirurgie 1981;24(4):427-33.
10- Smith DC. Appendicitis, appendectomy, and the surgeon. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1996;70(3):414-41.
11- Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World journal of surgery 1997;21(3):313-7.
12- Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World journal of surgery 1997;21(3):313-7.
13- Morishita K, Gushimiyagi M, Hashiguchi M, Stein GH, Tokuda Y. Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. The American journal of emergency medicine 2007;25(2):152-7.
14- Wolfe JM, Henneman PL. Acute appendicitis. women 2013;1:2.
15- Pu D, Bedalov G, Fridrih S, Vu I, Banek T, Pasini J. Urinalysis, ultrasound analysis, and renal dynamic scintigraphy in acute appendicitis. Urology 1995;45(1):108-12.
16- Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ journal of surgery 2006;76(1‐2):71-4.
17- Kojima, K., Fujita, T., Imanari, Y. et al.: Usefulness of ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Nichi Rin Ge I Kaishi 1993; 54: 2524– 2528. (in Japanese)
18- Yamashita, Y., Nishino, Y. and Hirakawa, K.: Radiographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis, a disease commonly treated by emergency surgery. Establishment of the diagnosis depending on characteristic findings. Shokaki Geka (Intestinal Surgery) 2000; 23: 1903–1910. (in Japanese)
19- Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rao JA, Conn AK. Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis: diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT. The American journal of emergency medicine 1999;17(4):325-8.
20- Rao P, Boland G. Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain. Clinical radiology 1998;53(9):639-49.
21- Wolfe JM, Henneman PL. Acute appendicitis. women 2013;1:2.
22- Pouget-Baudry Y, Mucci S, Eyssartier E, Guesdon-Portes A, Lada P, Casa C, et al. The use of the Alvarado score in the management of right lower quadrant abdominal pain in the adult. Journal of visceral surgery 2010;147(2):e40-e4.
23- Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Annals of emergency medicine 1986;15(5):557-64.
24- Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. Journal of pediatric surgery 2002;37(6):877-81.
25- De Dombal F, Leaper D, Horrocks JC, Staniland JR, McCann A. Human and computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain: further report with emphasis on performance of clinicians. British medical journal 1974;1(5904):376.
26- Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. The European journal of surgery= Acta chirurgica 1995;161(4):273-81.
27- Iqbal MM, Ahmed T, Khan I, Iftikhar A, Shah SH, Magsi AM et. al. Experience of Tzanakis Scoring System for Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. Isra Med J. 2018; 10(1): 40-43
28- Brown JJ. Acute appendicitis: the radiologist's role. Radiology 1991;180(1):13-4.
29- Williams GR. Presidential Address: a history of appendicitis. With anecdotes illustrating its importance. Annals of surgery 1983;197(5):495-506.
30- Sahm M, Pross M, Lippert H. Acute appendicitis-changes in epidemiology, diagnosis and therapy. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie 2011;136(1):18-24.
31- Malik A A, Mir M F, Khurshid S U, Wani I, Dagga R. Modified Alvarado Score Versus Tzanakis Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Changing Clinical Practice. Int J Clin Muhammad Mansoor Iqbal et al. ISRA MEDICAL JOURNAL | Volume 10 - Issue 1 | Jan - Feb 2018 43 Exp Med. 2016;2(5):90-93.
32- Shashikala V, Hegde H, Victor AJ. Comparative study of Tzanakis score vs Alvarado score in the effective diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J of Biomed & Adv Res. 2016;7(9):418-20
33- Sigdel G, Lakhey P, Misra P. Tzanakis Score vs Alvarado in Acute Appendicitis. J Nepal Med Assoc 2010;49(178):96-9.
34- Malla B, Batajoo H. Comparison of Tzanakis Score vs Alvarado Score in the Effective diagnosis of acute Appendicitis. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2014;45(1):48-
Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Iqbal M, Ahmed M, Malik N, Kamran A, Qaiser M, Riaz S. Comparison of Tzanakis and Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, with Histopathology as gold standard. JRMC [Internet]. 30Jun.2022 [cited 24Sep.2022];26(2):290-4. Available from: http://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1872
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)