Comparison of Open versus Closed Reduction and Intramedullary Nailing in cases of Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures
Objective: To compare the frequency of various post-operative complications in open versus closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in cases of closed tibial shaft fractures.
Study Design: Comparative prospective study.
Settings: Orthopedic Surgery Department, Khairpur Medical College, Khairpur Mirs.
Study Duration: 1st February 2019 till 30 June 2020.
Materials and Methods: Hundred and seventy patients selected for this study were divided into Group C (Closed percutaneous) and group O (Open). A closed percutaneous procedure was performed through a small stab incision. Reduction and stabilization of fracture were accomplished with large forceps and manual traction. Open reduction was achieved through an adequate incision for exposure and then directly reducing the fracture. The reduction was maintained with the help of clamps. Follow-ups were carried out to look for surgical site infection, deep infection, mal-union, delayed union and nonunion, iatrogenic nerve injury.
Results: Surgical site infection was seen in 5 (5.88%) patients in group C and 9 (10.58%) in group O (p-value=0.404). Deep infection was seen in 3 (3.53%) patients in group C and 7 (8.34%) in group O (p-value=0.329). Mal-union was seen in 4 (4.71%) and 2 (2.35%) patients in group C and O respectively (p-value=0.682). Delayed union was seen in 4 (4.71%) and 3 (3.53%) patients in group C and O respectively (p-value=1.0). Non-union was seen in 2 (2.35%) and 1 (1.18%) patients in group C and O respectively (p-value=1.0). Iatrogenic nerve injury was not seen in either group.
Conclusion: It is concluded in our study that there is no significant difference in the rate of post-operative complications in open versus closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in cases of closed tibial shaft fractures.
2. Kaye JA, Jick H. Epidemiology of lower limb fractures in general practice in the United Kingdom. Injury Prevention. 2004;10:368-374. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2004.005843.
3. Xu H, Gu F, Xin J, Tian C, Chen F. A meta-analysis of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02199.
4. Wang B, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Hu B, Sun L, Ren C et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019;14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1479-0.
5. Whiting P, Galat D, Zirkle L, Shaw M, Galat J. Risk Factors for Infection After Intramedullary Nailing of Open Tibial Shaft Fractures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2019;33(6):e234-e239. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001441.
6. Stoddart M, Al-Hourani K. Plate-assisted intramedullary nailing of Gustilo type 3B open tibial Diaphyseal fractures: Does retained adjunct plate fixation affect complication rate? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2020;34(7):363-369. https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.5cffabaef6074e97f94aaeaa.
7. Erin-Madsen N, Aasvang TK, Viberg B, Bloch TB, Brix M, Tengberg PT. Knee pain and associated complications after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fracture. Danish Medical Journal. 2019;66(8):1-6.
8. Bauwens P, Malatray M, Fournier G, Rongieras F, Bertani A. Risk factors for complications after primary intramedullary nailing to treat tibial shaft fractures: A cohort study of 184 consecutive patients. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2021;107(3):102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102877.
9. Comparing two proportions - Sample size - Select statistical consultants. (2019, February 18). Select Statistical Consultants. https://select-statistics.co.uk/calculators/sample-size-calculator-two-proportions/.
10. Auston DA, Meiss J, Serrano R, Sellers T, Carlson G, Hoggard T et al. Percutaneous or open reduction of closed tibial shaft fractures during intramedullary nailing does not increase wound complications, infection or Nonunion rates. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2017;31(4):215-219. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000777.
11. Decruz J, Antony Rex RP, Khan SA. Epidemiology of inpatient tibia fractures in Singapore – A single centre experience. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2019;22(2):99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.01.004.
12. Wuarin L, Gonzalez AI, Zingg M, Belingam P, Hoffmeyer P, Peter R et al. Clinical and radiographic predictors of acute compartment syndrome in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020;21(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3044-8.
13. Heijboer RR, Lubberts B, Guss D, Johnson AH, Moon DK, DiGiovanni CW. Venous thromboembolism and bleeding adverse events in lower leg, ankle, and foot orthopaedic surgery with and without anticoagulants. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2019;101(6):539-546. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.18.00346.
14. O’Neill DC, Dekeyser GJ, Mortensen AJ, Makarewich, CA. Adolescent fat embolism syndrome after closed tibial shaft fracture: Treatment with emergent external fixation. Case Reports in Orthopedics. 2021;2021(1);1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5585085.
15. Bode G, Strohm PC, Südkamp NP, Hammer TO. Tibial shaft fractures - management and treatment options. A review of the current literature. Acta Chirurgiae orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae čechoslovaca. 2012;79(6):499-50.
16. Behlmer RJ, Whiting PS, Kliethermes SA, Wendt L, Simske NM, Sato EH et al. Reduction techniques for intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a comparative study. OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2021;4(1):e095. https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000095.
17. Karladani AH, Styf J. Percutaneous intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a new approach for prevention of anterior knee pain. Injury. 2001;32(9):736-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00038-9. PMID: 11600125.
18. Grundnes O, Reikerås O. Closed versus open medullary nailing of femoral fractures, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1992;63(5):492-496. DOI:10.3109/17453679209154721.
19. Werner BC, Griffin JW, Yang S, Brockmeier SF, Gwathmey, FW. Obesity is associated with increased postoperative complications after operative management of proximal humerus fractures. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 24(4):593-600. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.028.
20. Werner BC, Griffin JW, Yang S, Brockmeier SF, Gwathmey FW. Obesity is associated with increased postoperative complications after operative management of proximal humerus fractures. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015;24(4):593-600. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.028.
Copyright (c) 2021 Abdul Rasheed Napar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All research articles published in the Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College (JRMC) are fully open access: immediately freely available to read, download, and share. Copyrights of all articles published in JRMC are retained by the authors. First publication rights are granted to JRMC. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.